« Previous
Next »
Journal of Hepatology
Volume 50, Issue 4
, Pages 664-673
, April 2009
Who should get a liver graft?
References
- . Guidelines for selection of patients for liver transplantation in the era of donor-organ shortage. Lancet. 1999;354:1636–1639
- Liver Advisory Group; UK blood and transplant. Selection of patients for liver transplantation and allocation of donated livers in the UK. Gut. 2008;57:252–257
- Organ Donation Taskforce. Organs for transplants. A report from the Organ Donation Taskforce. Department of Health, Crown Publications; 2008.
- . MELD: the holy grail of organ allocation?. J Hepatol. 2005;42:16–20
- . The model for end-stage liver disease comes of age. Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11:249–263
- . Excellent liver transplant survival rates under the MELD/PELD system. Transpl Proc. 2005;37:585–588
- . Impact of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy on the use of high-risk organs for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1568–1574
- . The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transpl. 2005;5:307–313
- . Utility is not just posttransplant outcome!. Am J Transpl. 2006;6:2817
- Schaubel DE, Wolfe RA, Sima CS, Merion RM. Estimating the effect of a time-dependent treatment by levels of an internal time-dependent covariate. J Am Stat Assoc, in press.
- . The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality. Am J Transpl. 2008;8:419–425
- A2ALL Study Group. Improvement in survival associated with adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1806–1813
- Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;294:2726–2733
- Development of the new lung allocation system in the United States. Am J Transpl. 2006;6:1212–1227
- Calculating life
years from transplant (LYFT): methods for kidney and kidney-pancreas candidates. Am J Transpl. 2008;8:997–1011 - Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, Biggins SW, Kalbfleisch JD, Pomfret EA, Sharma P, et al. Survival benefit-based deceased-donor liver allocation. Am J Transpl, in press.
- . A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–871
- A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33:464–470
- MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:567–580
- . Re-weighting the model for end-stage liver disease score components. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1575–1581
- Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1652–1660
- Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1018–1026
- . Should donors and recipients be matched in liver transplantation?. J Hepatol. 2006;45:488–494
- . Hot topics in liver transplantation: organ allocation – extended criteria donor – living donor liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2008;48:S58–S67
- . The utility of extended criteria donor organs in severely ill liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2008;86:895–896
- Optimal utilization of donor grafts with extended criteria. A single-center experience in over 1000 liver transplants. Ann Surg. 2006;243:748–755
- . AASLD/ILTS transplant course: is there an extended donor suitable for everyone?. Liver Transpl. 2005;11(Suppl. 1):S2–S5
- Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transpl. 2006;6:783–790
- Report of the Paris consensus meeting on expanded criteria donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:1694–1707
- . The marginal liver donor – an update. Transpl Int. 2008;21:713
- . The use of marginal grafts in liver transplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:92–101
- . Assignment of steatotic livers by the Mayo model for end-stage liver disease. Transpl Int. 2005;18:577–583
- Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:1468–1475
- . Use of severely steatotic grafts in liver transplantation: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg. 2007;246:940–946
- Impact of donor graft steatosis on overall ouycome and viral recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:37–48
- Liver transplantation for hepatitis C. Effect of using older donor grafts on short- and medium-term survival. Arch Surg. 2008;143:679–685
- The new liver allocation system: moving towards evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:851–858
- . Liver transplant for hepatocelluar carcinoma: the impact of the MELD allocation policy. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl. 1):S261–S267
- . Model for end stage liver disease (MELD) exception guidelines. Liver Transpl. 2006;12(Suppl. 3):S85–S87
- Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693–699
- . Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: validation of the UCSF-expanded criteria based on preoperative imaging. Am J Transpl. 2007;7:2587–2596
- Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a proposal of a prognostic scoring system. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:389–394
- A new priority policy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation within the model for end-stage liver disease system. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:857–866
- . Waiting list removal rates among patients with chronic and malignant liver diseases. Am J Transpl. 2006;6:1416–1421
- . Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transpl. 2008;8:958–976
- Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a biological selection criterion for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1260–1267
- A prospective study on downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1505–1514
- . Etiology and prognosis of fulminant hepatitis in adults. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:S67–S79
- . Acute liver failure: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2008;47:1401–1415
- . Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure. Gastroenterology. 1989;97:439–445
- . MELD is superior to King’s College and Clichy’s criteria to assess prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:822–828
- MELD score as a predictor of pretransplant and posttransplant survival in OPTN/UNOS status 1 patients. Hepatology. 2004;39:764–769
- Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in fulminant hepatitis B. Hepatology. 1986;6:648–651
- MELD is superior to the King’s college and Clichy’s criteria irrespective of the clinical variants or etiology of fulminant hepatic failure. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:C-1;(A1)
- MELD score to predict outcome in adult patients with non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Liver Int. 2007;27:329–334
- Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure: an assessment of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and King’s College Hospital criteria. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:814–821
- . Comparison scoring model of severe viral hepatitis and model of end stage liver disease for the prognosis of patients with liver failure in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2999–3002
- . Utility of the Mayo end-stage liver disease score, King’s college criteria and a new in-hospital mortality score in the prognosis of in-hospital mortality in acute liver failure. Transpl Proc. 2006;38:927–929
- . Acute liver failure: redefining the syndromes. Lancet. 1993;342:273–275
- Section 121.8, Federal Register, [FR Doc. 98-8191] 42 CFR Part 121 April 2, 1998.
☆ The authors declare that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding from industries or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript. NIH funded study (R01 DK-70869).
PII: S0168-8278(09)00073-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.01.013
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Hepatology
Volume 50, Issue 4
, Pages 664-673
, April 2009
